Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Prodotti della ricerca
  3. A. Contributo su rivista
  4. A1. Articolo in rivista
  5. A survey on explainable reinforcement learning: state of the art, challenges and opportunities

A survey on explainable reinforcement learning: state of the art, challenges and opportunities

Author(s)
Melloni, Daniele
Zingoni, Andrea  
Date Issued
July 27, 2026
Type
article
Volume
40
Issue
5
Start Page
1
End Page
74
DOI
10.1007/s10618-026-01246-3
Journal
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY  
Abstract
In recent years, the interest towards eXplainable AI (XAI) has been growing exponentially. Thanks to its capability of making the inner mechanisms of black-box models clearer, XAI practitioners and researchers have been drawing forward interpretability and explainability. This applies also for Reinforcement Learning (RL), where agents perform actions in a predefined environment and learn through their own experiences. It has indeed demonstrated to be versatile and successful in many domains due to its inherent learning adaptability. However, the intrinsic opacity of many RL decision-making processes, often obtained through deep neural networks, are not directly accessible or human-readable. This mechanism hinders the adoption of its methods and models as non-experts users usually must invest a high cognitive load to understand RL environments. To address this, the field of eXplainable RL (XRL) has been thriving recently and has developed its own study methodologies. This work provides an extensive and in-depth literature review of eXplainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) to assess the current state of the art behind interpretability in RL and identify current opportunities and challenges. From this literature review, it becomes evident, in face of a series of preliminary and promising studies, the field of XRL still lacks a proper accounting towards full explainability. Moreover, it emerges that more effort should be devolved into developing paradigms with a human-in-the-loop factor and standardized metrics should be adopted to allow a fair comparison of different explanation methods.
Subjects

Explainable reinforce...

Reinforcement learnin...

Explainable artificia...

Machine learning

Artificial intelligen...

Handle
https://dspace.unitus.it/handle/2067/73174
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Zingoni_A survey.pdf

Size

5.43 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

2156f12c39f8ac35b9c6a623980babc5

Metrics

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify