Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/49437
Campo DCValoreLingua
dc.contributor.authorJourgholami, Meghdadit
dc.contributor.authorAbari, Maryam Etehadiit
dc.contributor.authorVenanzi, Racheleit
dc.contributor.authorTavankar, Farzamit
dc.contributor.authorPicchio, Rodolfoit
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T06:56:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-31T06:56:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022it
dc.identifier.issn18455719it
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2067/49437-
dc.description.abstractIt is well-known that soil and water conservation actions (e.g., installing water diversion structures) are necessary to restore skid trails after logging operations. However, there are some points that have yet to be determined concerning the efficacy of rehabilitation on sediment yield and nutrient export to the aquatic environment. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal distance among the water diversion structures (WDSs) to suppress runoff, sediment yield, and measure nitrate and phosphate concentrations on the skid trails of a mountainous ecosystem. The study was conducted on a total of 18 bounded runoff plots, each with a width of 4 m and a length of 120 m, divided into six treatment compartments done in triplicate. Beech logs were placed at a distance of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 meters. An untreated area (U) was set up during the recording period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2016. In all the WDS treatments and untreated trails (U), the observed peaks of runoff, sediment yield, as well as nitrate and phosphate concentrations was found to be significantly correlated with the amount of rainfall events. Results show that there was a decrease in surface runoff and runoff coefficient, sediment yield, and nitrate and phosphate concentrations by installing of WDS at different distances. The runoff and runoff coefficients (2.67 mm and 0.101, respectively) were at the lowest level in the WDS20 (WDS at a distance of 20 m). The sediment yield was significantly higher on the U, 13.52 g m-2 followed by WDS40, whereas the lowest values were detected at the WDS10. Significantly higher values of nitrate were found in the U (3.63 mg l-1), while the lowest amounts of nitrate were determined at WDS5 followed by the WDS20 treatment. The highest values of phosphate were found on the U treatment (0.278 mg l-1) followed by the WDS40 treatment, whereas the lowest phosphate values were measured in the WDS20 treated area. Therefore, it can be deduced that the recom-mended water diversion structure should be placed at a distance of 20 m to mitigate runoff, sediment yield, nitrate and phosphate exports on the skid trails.it
dc.format.mediumELETTRONICOit
dc.language.isoengit
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEffectiveness of Water Diversion Structure to Mitigate Runoff, Sediment Yield, Nitrate and Phosphate Concentrations in Skid Trail of Mountainous Forest Ecosystemit
dc.typearticle*
dc.identifier.doi10.5552/crojfe.2022.1563it
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134631125it
dc.identifier.isi000881428900009it
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85134631125it
dc.relation.journalCROATIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST ENGINEERINGit
dc.relation.firstpage355it
dc.relation.lastpage371it
dc.relation.numberofpages16it
dc.relation.volume43it
dc.relation.issue2it
dc.subject.scientificsectorAGR/06it
dc.subject.keywordscontour-felled logs; logging operation; nutrient loss; rainfall intensity; soil lossit
dc.subject.ercsectorLS_9_6it
dc.description.numberofauthors5it
dc.description.internationalit
dc.contributor.countryITAit
dc.contributor.countryIRNit
dc.type.refereeREF_1it
dc.type.miur262*
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1845-5719-
crisitem.journal.anceE193823-
È visualizzato nelle collezioni:A1. Articolo in rivista
File in questo documento:
File Descrizione DimensioniFormato Existing users please
EFFECT~2.PDFArticolo pubblicato3.29 MBAdobe PDF  Richiedi una copia
Visualizza la scheda semplice del documento

Page view(s)

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
controllato il 24-feb-2024

Download(s)

1
controllato il 24-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Questo documento è distribuito in accordo con Licenza Creative Commons Creative Commons