Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/47668
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrossi, Giampieroit
dc.contributor.authorVitali, Andreait
dc.contributor.authorLacetera, Nicolait
dc.contributor.authorDanieli, Pierpaoloit
dc.contributor.authorBernabucci, Umbertoit
dc.contributor.authorNardone, Alessandroit
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T14:49:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-06T14:49:28Z-
dc.date.issued2020it
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615it
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2067/47668-
dc.description.abstractA better understanding of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics is needed when assessing the carbon footprint (CFP) of livestock products and the effectiveness of possible agriculture mitigation strategies. This study aimed (i) to perform a cradle-to-gate CFP of pasture-based beef cattle in a Mediterranean agropastoral system (ii) and to assess the effects on the CFP of alternative tillage, fertilizing, and grazing practices under current (NCC) and future climate change (CC) scenarios. Minimum (Mt) and no-tillage (Nt) practices were compared to current tillage (Ct); a 50% increase (Hf) and decrease (Lf) in fertilization was evaluated against the current (Cf) rate; and rotational grazing (Rg) was evaluated versus the current continuous grazing (Cg) system. The denitrification-decomposition (DNDC) model was run using NCC as well as representative concentration pathways to investigate the effects of farm management practices coupled with future CC scenarios on SOC dynamics, N2O fluxes, and crop yield. Within NCC and CtCf, an emission intensity of 26.9 ± 0.7 kg CO2eq per kg live body weight was estimated. Compared to Ct, the adoption of Mt and Nt reduced the CFP by 20% and 35%, respectively, while NtHf reduced it by 40%. Conservation tillage practices were thus shown to be effective in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.it
dc.format.mediumELETTRONICOit
dc.language.isoengit
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleCarbon Footprint of Mediterranean Pasture-Based Native Beef: Effects of Agronomic Practices and Pasture Management under Different Climate Change Scenariosit
dc.typearticle*
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani10030415it
dc.identifier.pmid32131471it
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85081237820it
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/3/415it
dc.relation.journalANIMALSit
dc.relation.article415it
dc.relation.volume10it
dc.relation.issue3it
dc.description.numberofauthors6it
dc.description.internationalnoit
dc.contributor.countryITAit
dc.type.miur262*
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2076-2615-
crisitem.journal.anceE211799-
Appears in Collections:A1. Articolo in rivista
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
animals-10-00415 carbon footprint castel porziano.pdf1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

8
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Jan 21, 2025

Page view(s)

146
Last Week
0
Last month
7
checked on Jan 25, 2025

Download(s)

12
checked on Jan 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons