Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/47082
Title: Seed quantity affects the fungal community composition detected using metabarcoding
Authors: Oskay, Funda
Vettraino, Anna Maria 
Doğmuş, H Tuğba
Lehtijärvi, Asko
Woodward, Stephen
Cleary, Michelle
Journal: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 
Issue Date: 2022
Abstract: 
Pest introductions via trade in tree seed may result from a lack of adequate survey and validation protocols. Developing better diagnostic protocols to identify potentially harmful pests and pathogens in forest tree seed is of critical importance. High-throughput sequencing-based barcoding and metabarcoding provide effective tools for screening potentially harmful organisms in various plant materials, including seeds. However, the sample size needed to detect the total microorganism diversity of a community is a major challenge in microbiome studies. In this work, we examined how increasing sample size (ranging between 100 and 1000 seeds) influences diversity of fungal communities detected by high throughput sequencing in Pinus sylvestris seeds. Our results showed that as sample size increased, fungal alpha diversity also increased. Beta-diversity estimators detected significant differences between the mycobiota from different samples. However, taxonomic and functional diversity were not correlated with sample size. In addition, we found that increasing the number of PCR replicates resulted in a higher abundance of plant pathogens. We concluded that for the purpose of screening for potentially harmful pathogens using HTS, greater efforts should be made to increase the sample size and replicates when testing tree seed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/47082
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06997-9
Rights: CC0 1.0 Universal
Appears in Collections:A1. Articolo in rivista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
Scientific reports 2022.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Sep 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons