Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/455
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDel Prete, Antonella-
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-27T15:03:41Z-
dc.date.available2008-03-27T15:03:41Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationSyllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes. Réponse à Massimiliano Savini, in A. Del Prete (a cura di), Il Seicento e Descartes. Dibattiti cartesiani, Firenze, Le Monnier, 2004, pp. 198-202en
dc.identifier.isbn88-00-86072-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2067/455-
dc.description.abstractMartin Schoock's various attempts to criticise Descartes focus on the latter's plan to refute traditional logic and to adopt a different method. Schoock also attacked Descartes' criterion of evidence and his physics, which were not based on the Aristotelian model of syllogistic proof. The same assumptions also underlie his accusation of magic, which ought perhaps to be considered in the light of the ongoing polemical debates between Schoock's teacher, Gijsbert Voetius, and Robert Fludd.en
dc.language.isofren
dc.publisherLe Monnieren
dc.subjectMartin Schoocken
dc.subjectRené Descartesen
dc.titleSyllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartesen
dc.typeBook chapteren
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1fr-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeBook chapter-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:DISTU - Archivio della produzione scientifica
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Dec 1, 2020

Download(s)

3
checked on Dec 1, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons