Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/455
Title: Syllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes
Authors: Del Prete, Antonella
Keywords: Martin Schoock;René Descartes
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: Le Monnier
Source: Syllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes. Réponse à Massimiliano Savini, in A. Del Prete (a cura di), Il Seicento e Descartes. Dibattiti cartesiani, Firenze, Le Monnier, 2004, pp. 198-202
Abstract: 
Martin Schoock's various attempts to criticise Descartes focus on the latter's plan to refute traditional logic and to adopt a different method. Schoock also attacked Descartes' criterion of evidence and his physics, which were not based on the Aristotelian model of syllogistic proof. The same assumptions also underlie his accusation of magic, which ought perhaps to be considered in the light of the ongoing polemical debates between Schoock's teacher, Gijsbert Voetius, and Robert Fludd.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/455
ISBN: 88-00-86072-9
Appears in Collections:DISTU - Archivio della produzione scientifica

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 24, 2020

Download(s)

1
checked on Oct 24, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons