Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/43186
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAntonelli, Federicait
dc.contributor.authorGalotta, Giuliait
dc.contributor.authorSidoti, Giancarloit
dc.contributor.authorZikeli, Florianit
dc.contributor.authorNisi, Rossellait
dc.contributor.authorDavidde Petriaggi, Barbarait
dc.contributor.authorRomagnoli, Manuelait
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T21:31:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-16T21:31:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020it
dc.identifier.issn2296-2646it
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2067/43186-
dc.description.abstractWaterlogged archaeological wood comes from submerged archaeological sites (in lake, sea, river, or wetland) or from land waterlogged sites. Even if the wooden object seems to have maintained the original size and shape, the wood is more or less severely decayed because of chemical and biological factors which modify the normal ratio of cellulose and lignin in the cell wall. Drying procedures are necessary for the musealization but potentially cause severe shrinkages and collapses. The conservation practices focus not only on removing water from wood but also on substituting it with materials able to consolidate the degraded wood cell walls like polymers (e.g., PEG), sugars (e.g., lactitol), or resins (e.g., Kauramin). In the present work three different nano-scale consolidants were tested: lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) obtained form beech wood via a non-solvent method involving dialysis; bacterial nanocellulose (BC) obtained from cultures fed with agro-alimentary waste; cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) chemically extracted from native cellulose. Waterlogged archaeological wood samples of different species (oak, elm, stone pine, and silver fir) characterized by different levels of degradation were impregnated with the consolidants. The treatments efficiency was evaluated in terms of macroscopic observation of treated samples, anti-shrink efficiency (ASE) and equilibrium moisture content (EMC). The results obtained for the three consolidants showed substantial differences: LNPs and CNCs penetrated only about a millimeter inside the treated wood, while BC formed a compact layer on the surface of the cell walls throughout the thickness of the samples. In spite of successful BC penetration, physical evaluation of treatment efficiency showed that BC nanoparticles did not obtain a satisfying consolidation of the material. Based on the reported results more focused test protocols are optimized for future consolidation experiments.it
dc.format.mediumELETTRONICOit
dc.language.isoengit
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleCellulose and Lignin Nano-Scale Consolidants for Waterlogged Archaeological Woodit
dc.typearticle*
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fchem.2020.00032it
dc.identifier.pmid32064250it
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079500305it
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85079500305it
dc.relation.journalFRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRYit
dc.relation.article32it
dc.relation.volume8it
dc.subject.scientificsectorAGR/06 Tecnologia del legno e Utilizzazioni Forestaliit
dc.subject.keywordscellulose nanocrystals (CNC)it
dc.subject.keywordscultural heritageit
dc.subject.keywordslignin nanoparticles (LNP)it
dc.subject.ercsectorLS9-4it
dc.description.numberofauthors7it
dc.description.internationalnoit
dc.contributor.countryITAit
dc.type.refereeREF_1it
dc.type.miur262*
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2296-2646-
crisitem.journal.anceE224629-
Appears in Collections:A1. Articolo in rivista
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
2020-507262_Antonelli_Manuscript-frontiers.pdf5.99 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

32
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

58
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

5
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons