Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2067/42967
Campo DCValoreLingua
dc.contributor.authorBragard, Claudeit
dc.contributor.authorDehnen-Schmutz, Katharinait
dc.contributor.authorDi Serio, Francescoit
dc.contributor.authorGonthier, Paoloit
dc.contributor.authorJacques, Marie-Agnèsit
dc.contributor.authorJaques Miret, Josep Antonit
dc.contributor.authorJustesen, Annemarie Fejerit
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Alanit
dc.contributor.authorMagnusson, Christer Svenit
dc.contributor.authorMilonas, Panagiotisit
dc.contributor.authorNavas-Cortes, Juan Ait
dc.contributor.authorParnell, Stephenit
dc.contributor.authorReignault, Philippe Lucienit
dc.contributor.authorThulke, Hans-Hermannit
dc.contributor.authorVan der Werf, Wopkeit
dc.contributor.authorCivera, Antonio Vicentit
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Jonathanit
dc.contributor.authorZappalà, Luciait
dc.contributor.authorBattisti, Andreait
dc.contributor.authorVettraino, Anna Mariait
dc.contributor.authorLeuschner, Renatait
dc.contributor.authorMosbach-Schulz, Olafit
dc.contributor.authorRosace, Maria Chiarait
dc.contributor.authorPotting, Roelit
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T12:30:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-23T12:30:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019it
dc.identifier.issn1831-4732it
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2067/42967-
dc.description.abstractThe EFSA Panel on Plant health was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on how far the existing requirements for the bonsai pine species subject to derogation in Commission Decision 2002/887/EC would cover all plant health risks from black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) bonsai (the commodity defined in the EU legislation as naturally or artificially dwarfed plants) imported from Japan, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Japan. The relevance of an EU-regulated pest for this opinion was based on: (a) evidence of the presence of the pest in Japan; (b) evidence that P. thunbergii is a host of the pest and (c) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity. Sixteen pests that fulfilled all three criteria were selected for further evaluation. The relevance of other pests present in Japan (not regulated in the EU) for this opinion was based on (i) evidence of the absence of the pest in the EU; (ii) evidence that P. thunbergii is a host of the pest; (iii) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity and (iv) evidence that the pest may have an impact in the EU. Three pests fulfilled all four criteria and were selected for further evaluation (Crisicoccus pini, Sirex nitobei and Urocerus japonicus). For the selected 19 pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier were evaluated. Limiting factors on the effectiveness of the measures were documented. For each of the 19 pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including any uncertainties. For all evaluated pests, the median likelihood of the pest freedom is 99.5% or higher and within the 90% uncertainty range it is 99% or higher.it
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.titleCommodity risk assessment of black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) bonsai from Japanit
dc.typearticle*
dc.identifier.doi10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5667it
dc.identifier.pmid32626301it
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066487755it
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85066487755it
dc.relation.journalEFSA JOURNALit
dc.relation.firstpagee05667it
dc.relation.volume17it
dc.relation.issue5it
dc.type.miur262*
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1831-4732-
crisitem.journal.anceE201431-
È visualizzato nelle collezioni:A1. Articolo in rivista
File in questo documento:
File Descrizione DimensioniFormato Existing users please
j.efsa.2019.5667.pdf18.79 MBAdobe PDF  Richiedi una copia
Visualizza la scheda semplice del documento

SCOPUSTM
Citations 20

9
Last Week
0
Last month
0
controllato il 14-apr-2024

Page view(s)

56
Last Week
0
Last month
1
controllato il 17-apr-2024

Download(s)

3
controllato il 17-apr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Questo documento è distribuito in accordo con Licenza Creative Commons Creative Commons