Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Commodity risk assessment of black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) bonsai from Japan
Authors: Bragard, Claude
Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
Di Serio, Francesco
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie-Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas-Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans-Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Civera, Antonio Vicent
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Battisti, Andrea
Vettraino, Anna Maria 
Leuschner, Renata
Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
Rosace, Maria Chiara
Potting, Roel
Issue Date: 2019
The EFSA Panel on Plant health was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on how far the existing requirements for the bonsai pine species subject to derogation in Commission Decision 2002/887/EC would cover all plant health risks from black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) bonsai (the commodity defined in the EU legislation as naturally or artificially dwarfed plants) imported from Japan, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Japan. The relevance of an EU-regulated pest for this opinion was based on: (a) evidence of the presence of the pest in Japan; (b) evidence that P. thunbergii is a host of the pest and (c) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity. Sixteen pests that fulfilled all three criteria were selected for further evaluation. The relevance of other pests present in Japan (not regulated in the EU) for this opinion was based on (i) evidence of the absence of the pest in the EU; (ii) evidence that P. thunbergii is a host of the pest; (iii) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity and (iv) evidence that the pest may have an impact in the EU. Three pests fulfilled all four criteria and were selected for further evaluation (Crisicoccus pini, Sirex nitobei and Urocerus japonicus). For the selected 19 pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier were evaluated. Limiting factors on the effectiveness of the measures were documented. For each of the 19 pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including any uncertainties. For all evaluated pests, the median likelihood of the pest freedom is 99.5% or higher and within the 90% uncertainty range it is 99% or higher.
ISSN: 1831-4732
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5667
Rights: CC0 1.0 Universal
Appears in Collections:A1. Articolo in rivista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
j.efsa.2019.5667.pdf18.79 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Show full item record

Citations 10

Last Week
Last month
checked on Apr 13, 2021

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Apr 20, 2021

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons