Syllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes

Author(s)
Del Prete, Antonella
Date Issued
2004
Type
Book chapter
Abstract
Martin Schoock's various attempts to criticise Descartes focus on the latter's plan to refute traditional logic and to adopt a different method. Schoock also attacked Descartes' criterion of evidence and his physics, which were not based on the Aristotelian model of syllogistic proof. The same assumptions also underlie his accusation of magic, which ought perhaps to be considered in the light of the ongoing polemical debates between Schoock's teacher, Gijsbert Voetius, and Robert Fludd.
Citation
Syllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes. Réponse à Massimiliano Savini, in A. Del Prete (a cura di), Il Seicento e Descartes. Dibattiti cartesiani, Firenze, Le Monnier, 2004, pp. 198-202
Subjects

Martin Schoock

René Descartes

Handle
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

Syllogisme, hypothèse et démonstration dans la polémique Schoock-Descartes.pdf

Size

36.52 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

3f72dfd565e9356b6515d510234e89c9