Repository logo
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Prodotti della ricerca
  3. A. Contributo su rivista
  4. A1. Articolo in rivista
  5. Found in Complexity, Lost in Fragmentation: Putting Soil Degradation in a Landscape Ecology Perspective

Found in Complexity, Lost in Fragmentation: Putting Soil Degradation in a Landscape Ecology Perspective

Author(s)
Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, Rares
Polinesi, Gloria
Chelli, Francesco
Salvati, Luca
Bianchini, Leonardo  
more
Date Issued
2022
Type
article
Volume
19
Issue
5
DOI
10.3390/ijerph19052710
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH  
Abstract
The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) assumes spatial disparities in land resources as a key driver of soil degradation and early desertification processes all over the world. Although regional divides in soil quality have been frequently observed in Mediterranean-type ecosystems, the impact of landscape configuration on the spatial distribution of sensitive soils was poorly investigated in Southern Europe, an affected region sensu UNCCD. Our study proposes a spatially explicit analysis of 16 ecological metrics (namely, patch size and shape, fragmentation, interspersion, and juxtaposition) applied to three classes of a landscape with different levels of exposure to land degradation (‘non-affected’, ‘fragile’, and ‘critical’). Land classification was based on the Environmentally Sensitive Area Index (ESAI) calculated for Italy at 3 time points along a 50-year period (1960, 1990, 2010). Ecological metrics were calculated at both landscape and class scale and summarized for each Italian province—a relevant policy scale for the Italian National Action Plan (NAP) to combat desertification. With the mean level of soil sensitivity rising over time almost everywhere in Italy, ‘non-affected’ land became more fragmented, the number of ‘fragile’ and ‘critical’ patches increased significantly, and the average patch size of both classes followed the same trend. Such dynamics resulted in intrinsically disordered landscapes, with (i) larger (and widely connected) ‘critical’ land patches, (ii) spatially diffused and convoluted ‘fragile’ land patches, and (iii) a more interspersed and heterogeneous matrix of ‘non affected’ land. Based on these results, we discussed the effects of increasing numbers and sizes of ‘critical’ patches in terms of land degradation. A sudden expansion of ‘critical’ land may determine negative environmental consequences since (i) the increasing number of these patches may trigger desertification risk and (ii) the buffering effect of neighboring, non-affected land is supposed to be less efficient, and this contains a downward spiral toward land degradation less effectively. Policy strategies proposed in the NAPs of affected countries are required to account more explicitly on the intrinsic, spatio-temporal evolution of ‘critical’ land patches in affected regions.
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/2067/47038
File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

ijerph-19-02710.pdf

Size

1.53 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

9748a9c97eeb11a3568294484c427207

Metrics

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify