<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Unitus DSpace</title>
    <link>http://http://dspace.unitus.it:80</link>
    <description>The DSpace digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T09:10:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Estimation of maize canopy properties from remote sensing by inversion of 1-D and 4-D models</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2067/1399</link>
      <description>Title: Estimation of maize canopy properties from remote sensing by inversion of 1-D and 4-D models
Authors: Casa, Raffaele; Baret, Fréderic; Buis, Samuel; Lopez-Lozano, Raul; Pascucci, Simone; Palombo, Angelo; Jones, Hamlyn G.
Abstract: The inversion of canopy reflectance models is widely used for the retrieval of&#xD;
vegetation properties from remote sensing. However the accuracy of the estimates depends&#xD;
on a range of factors, most notably the realism with which the canopy is represented by the&#xD;
models and the possibility of introducing a priori knowledge on canopy characteristics to&#xD;
constrain the inversion procedure. The objective of the present work was to compare the&#xD;
performances and operational limitations of two contrasting types of radiative transfer&#xD;
models: a classical one-dimensional canopy reflectance model, PROSPECT?SAIL&#xD;
(PROSAIL), and a three-dimensional dynamic (4-D) maize model. The latter introduces&#xD;
greater realism into the description of the canopy structure and implicit a priori information&#xD;
on the crop. The assessment was carried out with multiple view angle data recorded from&#xD;
field experiments on maize at stages V5 to V8. The simplex numerical optimization&#xD;
algorithm was used to invert the two models, using spectral reflectance data for PROSAIL&#xD;
and gap fraction data for the 4-D maize model. Leaf area index (LAI) was estimated with a&#xD;
RMSE of 0.48 for PROSAIL and 0.35 for the 4-D model. Retrieval of average leaf&#xD;
inclination angle (ALA) was problematic with both models. The effect of the number and&#xD;
distribution of observation view angles was examined, and the results highlight the&#xD;
advantage of oblique angle measurements.
Description: L'articolo é disponibile sul sito dell'editore: http://www.springerlink.com</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2067/1399</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-31T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

