<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://http://dspace.unitus.it:80">
    <title>Unitus DSpace</title>
    <link>http://http://dspace.unitus.it:80</link>
    <description>The DSpace digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2067/1651" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-26T08:05:29Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2067/1651">
    <title>Effects of administration of probiotic strains on GALT of larval gilthead seabream: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2067/1651</link>
    <description>Title: Effects of administration of probiotic strains on GALT of larval gilthead seabream: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies
Authors: Picchietti, Simona; Mazzini, Massimo; Taddei, Anna Rita; Renna, Raffaella; Fausto, Anna Maria; Mulero, Victoriano; Carnevali, Oliana; Cresci, Alberto; Abelli, Luigi
Abstract: Two bacterial strains Lactobacillus fructivorans (AS17B), isolated from adult seabream (Sparus aurata L.) gut, and Lactobacillus&#xD;
plantarum (906), isolated from human faeces, were administered contemporaneously during seabream development using&#xD;
Brachionus plicatilis and/or Artemia salina and dry feed as vectors.&#xD;
Experimental group A received the probiotic strains already via rotifers from day 5 post-hatch (ph), whereas treatment of group&#xD;
B began with Artemia feeding from day 27 ph. Fish were sampled at day 28 ph (group A and control) and day 99 ph (groups A, B&#xD;
and control) for electron microscopy, histology and immunohistochemistry with the polyclonal antiserum ORa against homologous&#xD;
serum Ig and the mAb G7 specific for seabream acidophilic granulocytes. In all groups, timing and pattern of differentiation of the&#xD;
digestive tract did not differ. Furthermore, neither tissue damage nor manifest inflammation was provoked by probiotic administration.&#xD;
At day 28 ph, the developing GALTalready housed mucosal leucocytes, including Igþ cells but no acidophilic granulocytes. No&#xD;
differences were seen between experimental groups.&#xD;
At day 99 ph, the density of Igþ cells (þ51%) and acidophilic granulocytes (þ284%) was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) in&#xD;
group A than in controls. Also group B had a higher density of Igþ cells (þ17%) and acidophilic granulocytes (þ130%) compared&#xD;
with controls, although less pronounced. Light and electron microscopy observations detailed the occurrence of heterogeneous populations&#xD;
of lymphocytes and granulocytes in the developing intestinal mucosa, and highlighted the net expansion of G7þ acidophilic&#xD;
granulocytes (A þ536%, B þ292% vs. control) due to probiotic administration.
Description: L'articolo è disponibile sul sito dell'editore http://www.sciencedirect.com/</description>
    <dc:date>2006-12-31T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

